Top Career in Energy Healing!

Ultimate EFT Certification Open for Enrollment Until Novemberr 1st

Meditation Doesn’t Help Just the Mind, But the Body Too

Clinical EFT Therapy Validated as Evidence-Based Practice for Psychological and Physiological Conditions2

A comprehensive scientific review of a therapy called Clinical EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) has been published in a top peer-reviewed journal, Frontiers in Psychology.

It compared the evidence for EFT against criteria published by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Empirically Validated Therapies. Summarizing the results of 56 randomized controlled trials, it found that EFT is highly effective for anxiety, depression, phobias, PTSD, and stress symptoms.

EFT, also known as acupoint tapping or simply “tapping,” is a practice that combines acupressure (tapping on acupuncture points) with elements of conventional psychological methods like cognitive processing and exposure therapy (focusing on distressing memories). Studies show that the addition of acupressure rapidly reduces the emotional triggering that results from disturbing events.

In the past decade, research in EFT has increasingly focused on objective biological markers such as cortisol levels, immune function, brain activity, and gene expression. It has also been used to successfully treat physical conditions including pain, insomnia, and autoimmune diseases.

The results of randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of research, showed EFTs effects to extend beyond the subjective perceptions of stress measured in psychology. The paper’s coauthor and EFT pioneer Dr. Dawson Church observed that, “Self-reporting and subjective change is one thing, but objective change means that independent of what you think or report, there are external positive changes that are measurable.”

The review concludes that Clinical EFT is “efficacious for a range of psychological and physiological conditions. Treatment is associated with measurable biological effects in the dimensions of gene expression, brain synchrony, hormonal synthesis, and a wide range of biomarkers.”

The paper noted several other characteristics of the treatment method. Comparatively few treatment sessions are required, treatment is effective whether delivered in person or virtually, and symptom improvements persist over time. Also, EFT works well as group therapy, which makes it cost effective to administer.

EFT is also unusually safe, with no reports of adverse events in the more than 2,000 study participants. This has led to it being characterized by the US Veterans Administration as a “generally safe therapy.” The paper notes the prevalence of “simultaneous symptom reduction,” where multiple psychological conditions (such as depression and anxiety) and physiological diagnoses (such as pain and insomnia) decline at the same time.

With over 125 studies now published in peer-reviewed journals, Clinical EFT is one of the most-researched treatment methods in the field of psychology. The review paper found it to be a stable and mature method with an extensive evidence base, capable of being used in primary care settings as a safe, rapid, reliable, and effective treatment for both psychological and medical diagnoses.

Many studies show that meditation produces positive psychological changes, such as reductions in anxiety and depression. Increasingly, researchers have turned their attention to its physical benefits, like improvements in cardiac function, inflammation, longevity, and chronic disease.

A large-scale randomized controlled trial published in the world’s top psychology journal measured improvements in both subjective psychological states and objective biological markers. It identified substantial changes in the biological function of participants at a 4-day guided meditation workshop.

The research team was led by investigator Dawson Church, head of the National Institute for Integrative Healthcare (NIIH). The researchers randomized the 513 participants into two groups, and found no significant difference in psychological symptoms — like anxiety, depression, and PTSD — between them at the outset of the study.

In addition to psychological conditions, the NIIH research team gathered data on the stress hormone cortisol and the immunity marker Salivary Immunoglobulin-A (SIgA). They also analyzed brain function using Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG).

Significant improvements were found, including a 49.5% median increase in SIgA, which is a primary measure of the functioning of the immunization system. Analysis of brain function showed increased amounts of a slow brain wave called delta, which is linked to relaxation, as well as reduced amounts of beta, a fast wave associated with anxiety and stress. Cortisol remained unchanged, though other studies have found that it often declines as people become more relaxed.

Over the four days of the workshop, the time it took participants to enter a meditative state declined significantly. Six months later, a follow-up showed that most of the improvements were maintained over time.

Church observed that, “This study is innovative in that it didn’t simply focus on subjective measures reported by participants. It measured changes on an objective biological level. When we feel better, in the form of reduced symptoms like anxiety and depression, our mood improves, and our quality of life gets better. But studies like this show that these subjective improvements correlate with changes in brain function and immune markers. Changing the mind changes the body.”

This clinical trial is one of several key studies conducted by NIIH over the past few years showing that meditation and other stress reduction techniques are more than mood-enhancing methods. They produce measurable biological effects. Among these are the reduction of inflammation, upgrades to immune function, enhanced gene expression, and reduced symptoms of autoimmune disease. 

Long considered “soft” science, practices like meditation are now being shown by “hard” science to produce measurable improvements in biological function. Practice guidelines published by NIIH recommend that they be used by doctors and nurses in the frontline of primary care. 

To read the original study: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928123/full  

Website of the National Institute for Integrative Healthcare: NIIH.org

Scroll to Top